When President Obama’s payroll tax holiday ended on January 1, socialists and Marxists flew to Twitter, Facebook and other online communities to complain.
They noticed that an additional two percent was taken from their paycheck for social security withholding and sent to the government -- money that was no longer in their pocket for them to spend as they see fit.
After I read through the complaints of many of these socialists on DailyKos.com -- an online community where President Obama was once a member -- these progressives sure sounded like fiscal conservatives who didn’t want the government to steal their money!
But unlike fiscal conservatives, they were confused about how the economy works.
For a long time, I’ve been saying that more Americans must have skin in the game -- to pay for the growing bureaucracy and handouts -- so we can reduce the size and scope of government. When more Americans are forced to pay for government programs, we’ll see more of them demanding a reduction in the size of government!
These comments are also a small taste of what will come in 2014 when many young people who choose not to buy health insurance today will be forced to buy it. If they think missing two percent from their paycheck is bad right now, then there’s a big surprise in store for them soon.
"I'm not someone who earns close to $400,000/year and $52 each paycheck will make a difference. I guess you really can't call this an increase since it's the payroll tax deduction that's being adjusted. But, when it's added up, nearly $1400 is definitely money that I could have used."
-- nspguy (username)
"For a lot of people, this 2% will mean hardship. For a lot of us, it's a few less dinners out and a few less video games or putting off the new iPhone a few months."
I'm getting ready to buy a car. But I'm waiting to see how much our take home pay is being affected before I decide what I want my monthly payment to be.
"The economy is already in a stage of anemic growth. Now is not the best time to reduce take home pay."
"Poor people don't need tax breaks. We need jobs. We need the Federal Government to step up and hire us to do hard work for reasonable pay under first world conditions. We need a fundamental change in the labor market. The Federal Government is the only possible employer capable of doing it."
Mine's about $38. Payroll tax. It hurts a bit, but I can afford it. I'm not sure about my kids.
"[My husband and I] were flabbergasted that no one cared to extend this and fight for this. Now we have a good chunk of money less coming in per month. Harder to pay bills and harder to buy necessities. YAY!"
"And it'll be very real that people will spend less. Already my husband and I are trying to figure out what we should cut out of our budget. 2% doesn't sound like a lot to people, but it is. "
"Every month, the President walked up And handed a guy $50. Like clockwork, incredibly reliable, $50. He said, "I'd like you to spend it, but if you save it or pay bills, I won't complain. Then "suddenly" (with plenty of notice to those who watch or read the news), the President stopped showing up. "Selfish jerk!" The guy responds. "He's taking my money!"
"This was a temporary rollback to stimulate the economy. [ … ] Think of this as an end to something you shouldn't have gotten in the first place."
"The temporary reduction of FICA taxes was just 2%, so in order for your taxes to have gone up by $52, your gross would have to be $2600. If it was, and your salary is $135,000 per year, I think you'll be able to handle $1,400 additional taxes."
"If your pulling in 150k, you've got plenty. Probably should be paying more in tax."
-- Frank Dewey
Share your comments below!
Your foot-soldier for freedom,
In our president's take on the world, if there is a winner who winds up better off there must be a loser who winds up equally worse off. (comments)
The Tea Party captures a groundswell of dissatisfaction with business-as-usual in how our country is being run. (comments)
What kind of discussion can take place with those who equate a procedure in which one life is destroyed and another put at risk with going to the dentist? (comments)
In 20 years there will be no funds to pay one third of the benefits of retirees. (comments)
The growing percentage of our voters is not white and they largely vote for Democrats. (comments)
Free choice and private initiative seems to violate the religious convictions of liberals. (comments)
Why does America convey neutrality between a nation that is indisputably free and a government that is not? (comments)
In a Pew Research survey of last October, 25 percent of blacks expressed favorability toward the Tea Party, just 6 points less than whites. (comments)
Everyone, except the teachers unions, seems to grasp that public education in America, particularly in low-income communities, suffers because of lack of competition. (comments)
Mainstream means shrugging your shoulders at $17 trillion in federal debt, $4 trillion in federal spending, and a tax code of over 73,000 pages. (comments)
Cochran's agenda is to serve up government pork and protect the interests of his friends in Washington. (comments)
Thought police have no place in a free society. (comments)
Americans elected a president, twice, who was not afraid of being bold, of taking on hard issues, and of being ideological. (comments)
Religion and the institutions of traditional marriage and family are being challenged and, rather than being seen as enablers of our freedom, are now regularly portrayed as obstacles to it. (comments)
No Americans have suffered more from the improper use of government and abuse of political power than black Americans. (comments)
Democrats and the left wing press know that fanning these still racially sensitive flames is the way to turn out black voters. (comments)
Should conservatives pander to the current liberal trends of the country to try and win votes in the short term? (comments)
The incidence of black conservatism is far deeper and widespread than most believe. (comments)
Congressional Budget Office report in February projects that Obamacare will shrink the American economy by 2.5 million jobs. (comments)
Limiting the amount of funds that free citizens can contribute stifles competition and protects incumbents. (comments)